Page 63 of 131 FirstFirst ... 13535455565758596061626364656667686970717273113 ... LastLast
Results 621 to 630 of 1307

Thread: Глобальное потепление?

  1. #621
    VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY, NY
    Posts
    61,861

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Miami Vice View Post
    Экономические повадки жены могут охладить температуру мужа и создать некий каунтербаланс всемирному потеплению в отдельно взятом семейном помещении.
    allow me to retort, те же повадки могут довести мужа до кипения и усугубить всемирный тепловой кризис!

  2. #622

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Izold View Post
    allow me to retort, те же повадки могут довести мужа до кипения и усугубить всемирный тепловой кризис!
    Так шо тогда делать?

  3. #623
    Forum Regular In2HiDef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Buckeye State
    Posts
    37,506

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Потеплисты не зря старались
    A congressional report found that foreign companies have been large beneficiaries of stimulus funds and received billions of dollars funds meant to promote green energy development and create jobs in the United States.
    The House Energy and Commerce Committee staff examined Treasury Department data and found that nearly one-quarter of the $16 billion in Section 1603 green energy grants went to a handful of large European and Asian renewable energy companies.
    “Billions of dollars have filled the coffers of overseas firms while the evidence of the promised permanent jobs and economic growth here in the United States is scarce,” reads the report. “With these grants, foreign companies appear to have unduly benefited from a program ostensibly aimed at stimulating the U.S. economy, growing American businesses, and creating U.S. jobs.”
    One of the largest recipients of these green energy funds was Iberdrola Renewables LLC — a U.S. division of the Spain-based Iberdrola, S.A. — which got $1.8 billion, 11 percent of the total awarded Section 1603 funds, for renewable projects throughout the U.S. The report notes that Iberdrola Renewables is, “one of the largest, if not the single-largest, owner of Section 1603 grant-recipient projects in the U.S.” Another U.S. subsidiary of a Spanish company, EDP Renewables North America LLC, received more than $722 million in Section 1603 funds for wind projects throughout the U.S.
    “The more we learn about DOE’s stimulus spending, the worse it appears,” said Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Tim Murphy in a statement. “The 1603 green energy program failed to deliver the jobs promised, and now we learn that a significant portion of these taxpayer-funded grants are benefiting foreign competitors rather than boosting American industry.”
    The Section 1603 program was created through the 2009 stimulus package as a grant program to promote renewable energy development in the U.S. and has handed out nearly $16 billion as of December 2012. According to the Treasury Department, $13 billion was already given to over 45,000 to renewable energy projects, including $10.8 billion to wind projects and $3.8 billion to solar projects.
    However, job creation from these grants has been modest and come at a substantial cost. Some experts saying the government has spent $1.2 million per job, according to the report.
    The report adds that the handouts to foreign companies have only served to reinforce the trend of global dominance of foreign companies in renewable energy markets. For example, nine out of the top-ten global wind turbine supply companies were headquartered outside of the U.S., according to the report. “With $16 trillion in debt, we cannot afford to send one out of every four taxpayer dollars overseas for a program that has failed to create the jobs promised,” said Michigan Republican Rep. Fred Upton, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee.
    At the end of 2012, $6 billion in Section 1603 funds had not been paid out to projects that began construction by Dec. 31, 2011.
    "America is too great for small dreams." ~ Ronald Reagan

  4. #624
    Forum Hero Alex_3112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Туц Оукыун
    Posts
    12,761

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by In2HiDef View Post
    Потеплисты не зря старались
    Тут уж дело не в потеплистах, а в том, что Америка отстает.

  5. #625
    VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY, NY
    Posts
    61,861

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_3112 View Post
    Тут уж дело не в потеплистах, а в том, что Америка отстает.
    в чём ет мы отстаём, во влиянии на окружающую среду?!

  6. #626
    подниматель пингвинов crazy-mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    L'viv
    Posts
    179,963

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Izold View Post
    в чём ет мы отстаём, во влиянии на окружающую среду?!
    Кстати - да. Китай сейчас намного сильнее загаживает окружающую среду чем Америка.
    Жизнь дается человеку один раз и прожить ее надо так, чтобы не ошибиться в рецептах.
    Строить Асгардию побуждает тьма, посетившая людские души

  7. #627
    VIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    30,092

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Izold View Post
    в чём ет мы отстаём, во влиянии на окружающую среду?!
    в выбросах парниковых газов в атмосферу и в загрязнении среды гадостями... пару лет назад Китай стал нас обгонять (немудрено с более чем миллиардным населением), но на душу населения загрязнителей равных нам все еще нет


  8. #628
    Forum Hero Alex_3112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Туц Оукыун
    Posts
    12,761

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Izold View Post
    в чём ет мы отстаём, во влиянии на окружающую среду?!
    В развитии возобновляемых источников энергии.

  9. #629
    VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY, NY
    Posts
    61,861

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by crazy-mike View Post
    Кстати - да. Китай сейчас намного сильнее загаживает окружающую среду чем Америка.
    шьёрт побьери! нужно срочно восстановить лидерство!

  10. #630
    VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NY, NY
    Posts
    61,861

    Default Re: Глобальное потепление?

    Quote Originally Posted by Alex_3112 View Post
    В развитии возобновляемых источников энергии.
    да и хрен с ими... быдем на нефти / угле/ газе ехать

Page 63 of 131 FirstFirst ... 13535455565758596061626364656667686970717273113 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russian America Top. Рейтинг ресурсов Русской Америки. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Рейтинг@Mail.ru