Новый электромобиль, влезают даже два человека:
![]()
попробуй пойди отними у кого нибудь дом с кольтом, аха
а с пинендзами - запросто
The recent Supreme Court ruling upheld the right of a city government to take away people's homes and give them to a private developer.
The process of taking private property – known as “eminent domain” – has a long history. Though the U.S. Constitution guarantees that private property can’t be taken “for public use without just compensation” the definition of “public use” has changed over the years. In the past, property has been taken to build railroads or highways. But with cash-strapped cities and towns looking for new sources of tax revenue, some have decided that developments that generate higher taxes fit the definition of “public use.”
The case that has riled property rights advocates involved the city of New London taking property from homeowners for a development that would generate higher tax revenues. Some homeowners didn’t want to move and sued. In a recent 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court sided with the city, raising fears that no one is safe from the threat of a developer tearing down their home to build a big box retailer or another cluster of McMansions.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|