вейвер на прививки 2

[Elenafla]

That's beoynd the point. We are talking about exemptions, based on nothing except your medieval beliefs, not about those, based on valid reasons that arise sometimes, such as adverse reactions.

What you call medieval beliefs are scientific facts. You just don't know about the pertinent information.

That's right, perhaps... But ALL the stupid ones think they have been misunderstood too. And there are a lot more of those.
If you are being misunderstood (or you think you are anyway), it is not a sign of your greatness, but, most likely, quite the opposite.

I have to state a "great mind" in comparison to your fact base. YOur opinions are based on what?

THe fact that everyday you act like a dog and make sure the government gets their paper that the immigrant has had their vaccines.

My background is with regular people or parents who's kids have been injured by vaccines. I know the ingredients in every single one. I know the germ theory and how effective vaccines may be or are suppose to be, and in just what manner they are working or may work, and how that is accomplished physiologically. I know how diseases work hold the vaccine.

I know the statistics of what has happened with diseases in the past including what happened after the commencement of vaccines.

I know how the immune system operates( in four different medical models based in Western Medicine and Eastern Medicine). I know when the immune system operates fully and how it develops.

I also know many unvaccinated people. None create any problems. Just people like you cause problems.

If you too know all this, then I retract my statement.

[Baba_Yaga]

Ну ведь это против американской конституции. Они имеют право решать делать прививки или нет. Тут очень много детей не привитых и ходят они в школу без проблем... А мать она же никаких законов не нарушила за что депортация?

Американская конституция распространяется на американских граждан, а она (ваша знакомая) даже зелёную карточку не получила. Так о чём вы здесь рассуждаете? Это раз, во-вторых, ни в одну школу без прививок не возьмут. А в третьих, согласен с определением Фомы по отношению к вашей знакомой - [Nut case].

[Фoма]

What you call medieval beliefs are scientific facts.

No. You can't apply for a waiver based on scientific facts, can you?
You can only cat it on basis of your beliefs. So, there is no question about whether or not what you are advocating here are beliefs, not facts.
I am just saying that they, these believes are medieval.

I have to state a "great mind" in comparison to your fact base. YOur opinions are based on what?

You have state enough nonsense so far, one more statement won't surprise me :-)
As for my opinions, they are based on facts and conclusions established in about a century worth of medical research by the best minds of the humand kind all around the globe.
How about yours? They are based on what you "know about disease"? I hope, you'll pardon me my doubts :-)

[Фoма]

What you call medieval beliefs are scientific facts.

No. You can't apply for a waiver based on scientific facts, can you?
You can only cat it on basis of your beliefs. So, there is no question about whether or not what you are advocating here are beliefs, not facts.
I am just saying that they, these believes are medieval.

I have to state a "great mind" in comparison to your fact base. YOur opinions are based on what?

You have state enough nonsense so far, one more statement won't surprise me :-)
As for my opinions, they are based on facts and conclusions established in about a century worth of medical research by the best minds of the humand kind all around the globe.
How about yours? They are based on what you "know about disease"? I hope, you'll pardon me my doubts :-)

[Elenafla]

No. You can't apply for a waiver based on scientific facts, can you?
You can only cat it on basis of your beliefs. So, there is no question about whether or not what you are advocating here are beliefs, not facts.
I am just saying that they, these believes are medieval.



You have state enough nonsense so far, one more statement won't surprise me :-)
As for my opinions, they are based on facts and conclusions established in about a century worth of medical research by the best minds of the humand kind all around the globe.
How about yours? They are based on what you "know about disease"? I hope, you'll pardon me my doubts :-)

You cannot understand my beliefs, muchless categorize them.
They are modern not medieval. They can only be modern because they relate
to modern vaccination schedules and ingredients.



I've been around the globe in the hospitals and worked with the doctors.

So I'll pardon your ignorance, not your doubts.

[9999]

Американская конституция распространяется на американских граждан, а она (ваша знакомая) даже зелёную карточку не получила. Так о чём вы здесь рассуждаете? Это раз, во-вторых, ни в одну школу без прививок не возьмут. А в третьих, согласен с определением Фомы по отношению к вашей знакомой - [Nut case].

Это как раз не верно- американская конституция распространяется на все, находящихся на территории США. Другое дело, что некоторых из находящихся очень даже легко пнуть ногой под зад с этой территории , и тем самым снять проблему...

[Фoма]

Это как раз не верно- американская конституция распространяется на все, находящихся на территории США.

Это тоже не верно. Некоторые статьи действительно распространяются на всех,а другии - только на американцев.

[Фoма]

They can only be modern because they relate
to modern vaccination schedules and ingredients.

It does not mater what they relate to. For example. if your belief was that telephone is a satanic device, it would also be medieval even though they did not have telephone in middle ages.

Ancient people, much like you, were limited in their views to what they have learned from their own primitive experiences. There was no global (or any for that matter) information exchange, nor any means of collaborative research.
That is why stubborn and shortsighted convictions like yours are called medieval, not because of what they relate to.

[9999]

Это тоже не верно. Некоторые статьи действительно распространяются на всех,а другии - только на американцев.

В целом конституция распространяется на всех, если там что то относится только к гражданам США, то так и сказано.

[Фoма]

В целом конституция распространяется на всех, если там что то относится только к гражданам США, то так и сказано.

Нет, наоборот. То, что относится не только к гражданам, оговаривается специально.