Вторжение РФии в Украину......

[Кузька]

Почему в стране, в которой война, нет мобилизации ? В Израиле по сути войны нет, а мобилизация есть . А Украина такая …. Жду французов трамвая

[Кузька]

Не спорь.

[Сиамчик]

[Skylight]

[robson]

Почему в стране, в которой война, нет мобилизации ? В Израиле по сути войны нет, а мобилизация есть . А Украина такая …. Жду французов трамвая

А чем будут стрелять эти мобилизованные?

[Skylight]

шо значит придать ускорение, как сразу люди мотивируют себя в канструктивное русло...

[Skylight]

А чем будут стрелять эти мобилизованные?

Асобенно есле хто при Порошенко продавал вертолетные двигатели рашке черес третьи страны, а патом рашка теми новейшими верталетами атаковала украинские города.

А патом его обьявиле предателем Украины и я за ево жизнь не ручаюсь, бо счяс бы украинские вертолеты с теми движками прикрывали пехоту ВСУ

и Макрон бы не дергался са сваим популизмом. Есчо бапка-училка ево старенькая надвое сказала, када те французские легионеры будут в Украине...

[Кузька]

А чем будут стрелять эти мобилизованные?

а сейчас чем стреляете?

[Кузька]

Асобенно есле хто при Порошенко продавал вертолетные двигатели рашке черес третьи страны, а патом рашка теми новейшими верталетами атаковала украинские города.

а у вас есть не коррумпированные и не бизнесмены ?

[Skylight]

U.S. House Proposes $34 Billion in Military Support to Bolster Ukraine Against Russian Aggression
Story by Isaac Jones

The U.S. House of Representatives has signaled a significant shift in its stance towards aiding Ukraine amidst the ongoing conflict with Russia, as a proposal for a substantial $34 billion in military support is set to be tabled. This development follows months of political wrangling and significant pressure from both within the U.S. and the international community.

The impetus for the proposed aid package comes from the overwhelming desire of the American electorate to robustly support Ukraine in its self-defense against Russian incursions. The House Speaker, after initially stalling the aid, has finally conceded to bring the proposal to a vote, which could happen as early as this month.

Although the specifics of the proposal have not been detailed, there are strong indications that it will closely reflect the Senate’s previously passed package, which included $60 billion for Ukraine, $34 billion of which was dedicated to military assistance. This funding would be used to purchase a variety of defense capabilities, including radars, jammers, drones, boats, armored vehicles, and, most notably, artillery and air-defenses—crucial areas where Ukraine has required support.

This proposed aid comes at a time when Ukraine has been struggling with ammunition shortages, having relied on U.S. supplies that have been curtailed in recent months. The additional funding could significantly alter the current dynamics on the battlefield by enabling Ukrainian forces to match and potentially surpass the artillery fire rate of Russian batteries, a critical factor that has influenced the ebb and flow of the conflict to date.

Moreover, the aid would bolster Ukraine’s air defenses with additional Patriot batteries and missiles, which are pivotal in protecting urban centers from aerial threats. A ramp-up in the production of 155-millimeter artillery shells, which could see an output of up to 100,000 shells a month, would further enhance Ukraine’s defensive capabilities.

While the injection of military aid carries the promise of changing the tide in Ukraine’s favor, the proposal has stirred a mix of political action and partisanship in Washington. Democrats, as the minority, have sought to force a floor vote on the Senate’s $95 billion package, which includes aid for Ukraine, through a discharge petition. Meanwhile, centrist Republicans have initiated their own discharge petition for a trimmed package with border security amendments, underscoring the complexities of navigating foreign aid through a divided Congress.