Как страшно жить!!! Канадские нефтяные пески принадлежат Аль Каеде..... ахренедь....Originally Posted by Птиц
Re: Камедиа
Как страшно жить!!! Канадские нефтяные пески принадлежат Аль Каеде..... ахренедь....
Re: Камедиа
Сказки о полезных диктаторах одинаковы везде.
"He sure is but he is our son of a bitch"
Странно, что приходится тебе это напоминать.
Я не хамлю — я защищаюсь от вашей тупости.
Re: Камедиа
ты йопнулсо?
Re: Камедиа
Gallup: Ukrainians Loathe the Government that Obama Imposed
Posted on December 23, 2015 by Eric Zuesse.
Eric Zuesse
On December 23rd, Gallup headlines “Ukrainians Disillusioned With Leadership,” and reports that “nearly nine in 10 Ukrainians (88%) say corruption is widespread in their government, and about eight in 10 (81%) see the same widespread problem in their country’s businesses.” 8% of Ukrainians now say they “have confidence … about the national government.” 17% approve of the job-performance of their President, Petro Poroshenko. While the pre-coup President, Viktor Yanukovych, was in office, 2010-2014, that figure had been averaging about 23%, and was never as low as Poroshenko’s is now.
Gallup reports, “fewer Ukrainians now say their leadership is taking them in the right direction than before the revolution,” but that statement calling this coup a ‘revolution’ embodies the propaganda-lie of one of Gallup’s main clients, the U.S. government itself, which calls the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014 a “revolution,” when every honest and knowledgeable person now knows that this U.S. government claim — that it had helped install democracy instead of having ended it in Ukraine on 20 February 2014 — to have been a lie. Even the founder of the “private CIA” firm Stratfor has called the overthrow of Yanukovych “the most blatant coup in history.” It had been that because it was the first coup to be videoed by numerous people from many different angles with their cellphones and by TV cameras, uploaded to the Web by even anti-Yanukovych countries such as the UK’s BBC; and those videos, the best compilation of which is here, make clear that this was, indeed, a coup d’etat, no authentic revolution at all, such as the U.S. government claims.
Furthermore, the EU’s investigator who had been assigned to report to their Foreign Affairs Minister Cathy Ashton about the overthrow, reported to her that it had been a coup, and that even Petro Poroshenko himself said that “our” side — meaning the anti-Yanukovych people, had done it. Subsequently, evidence came to light showing how it had been organized: the organization for it had started in the U.S. Embassy in Kiev by no later than March 2013. Then, after all of that preparation, on 4 February 2014, the U.S. State Department’s Victoria Nuland gave the final instruction to the U.S. Ambassador in Kiev, to have Arseniy Yatsenyuk appointed to run the country after the coup, and he became appointed 18 days later, on 22 February 2014, to run the country as Prime Minister, until a new President would be elected ‘democratically’; but, even the election of President Poroshenko on 25 May 2014 was no democratic event, because the U.S. government didn’t want residents in the area of Ukraine that had voted over 90% for Yanukovych to be voting in that election. That area of Ukraine (which historically had been a part of Russia) was called Donbass, and it had no say whatsoever in determining Ukraine’s President after the coup, because the new coup-imposed Ukrainian government was already bombing it, starting on 9 May 2014. None of this could have happened without that ‘revolution’: U.S. President Barack Obama’s very bloody coup in Ukraine.
Here is the man whom the U.S. Ambassador in Kiev, Geoffrey Pyatt, worked with to organize the coup (or ‘revolution’), the co-founder of one of the two racist-fascist, or ideologically nazi, political parties in Ukraine. But Pyatt’s appointee (Andriy Parubiy) left the coup’s gun-play and military planning to that man’s paramilitary friend (Dmitriy Yarosh) who had founded the other of the two Ukrainian nazi parties.
And then, right after the coup, America’s stooge who now was running Ukraine for the U.S. regime, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, installed leaders of Ukraine’s two rabidly anti-Russian racist fascist or nazi parties into all of the top internal security and military positions, in order to carry out what they called the ‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ (ATO), or program to exterminate and drive out the residents of Donbass. The prestigious fascist U.S. think tank, the Brookings Institution, urged Obama to increase the firebombings of Donbass, but he decided not to follow that advice, at that particular time.
Obama wants ultimately to base American nuclear missiles in Ukraine on Russia’s border (much like the Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev had unsuccessfully tried to do to America in the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis), and this coup and ethnic-cleansing (to make the coup-regime stick) is how he goes about achieving his goal. Perhaps the next U.S. President will succeed in it. The entire plan had started under U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush, in 1990; and every U.S. President since then has advanced it further. The United States, ever since around 1980, hasn’t been a democracy; it’s a dictatorship. That’s why it does things like this.
Back in June 2014, shortly after Poroshenko became Ukraine’s President, a Gallup poll in Ukraine taken for the U.S. government showed (p. 27) a geographical breakdown of the answers to the question “Tell me whether you think Russia has played a mostly positive role or a mostly negative role in the crisis in Ukraine. Percent ‘mostly positive’”. The entire country was broken down into 6 regions there, which included not only the regions that had voted against Yanukovych in 2010 (such as the May 25th election had excluded) but also the two regions that had voted the most heavily for Yanukovych, Donbass (which had voted over 90% for him, and which here constituted the eastern half of the region called “East,” which entire region was shown as having rated Russia’s “role in the crisis in Ukraine” 35.7% as having been “mostly positive”), and also Crimea (which constituted the entirety of one of those 6 regions, and which had voted around 75% for Yanukovych, and which answered 71.3% that Russia’s “role” had been “mostly positive”). The only other region where Russia’s “role” had been rated as “mostly positive” by more than 3% was the area around Odessa, called here “South,” where 28.4% of the people rated it “mostly positive.”
All three of the other regions of the pre-coup Ukraine were the regions where the Presidential election had been held on May 25th of 2014: these were the regions Gallup categorized as Center (2.4% “mostly positive”), North (1.8% “mostly positive”), and West (1% “mostly positive”). So, Poroshenko had been elected as the President for all of Ukraine, but by only voters in the most anti-Russian half of that extremely divided country; and now the residents of two of the other areas (areas in the strongly pro-Yanukovych half of Ukraine) had tried to separate from Ukraine and to join again with Russia (of which those regions had long been parts): Crimea, and Donbass. Crimea was accepted by Putin into Russia, but Donbass was not.
U.S. President Obama imposed the economic sanctions against Russia for Russia’s having accepted the pleas of Crimeans to rejoin Russia, and for Russia’s opposition to the Obama-imposed government’s ethnic-cleansing program to exterminate and/or expell from Ukraine the residents of the Donbass region of Ukraine. The same European Union that accepted Obama’s bloody February 2014 Ukrainian coup have also been accepting his ethnic-cleansing campaign there; and Obama insists upon its being ultimately continued, notwithstanding his Secretary of State, John Kerry’s, internal opposition to it.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/...a-imposed.html
Re: Камедиа
Ещё Кота порадую.
"Чует сердце: скоро, скоро закончится время дураков — и начнется время других дураков."
Я не хамлю — я защищаюсь от вашей тупости.
Re: Камедиа
Может, в ымерженси какой позвонить?! Чел ночь напролет сидит и давление у ево уже нижнее выше верхнего! Что эти шакалы в мундирах с людьми делают, зверье...
Re: Камедиа
Это мазохизм )) Хотя в данном случае это другим словом называется.. даже в крыше не буду ругаться )
А еще он постоянно говорит о прочитанных книгах кгб-шных/гру-шных офицеров. У него пунктик по этому поводу )))
Deus quos vult perdere dementat prius (c)
Re: Камедиа
Oops, we “accidentally” armed al Qaeda with anti-tank missiles…again…
November 24, 2015 by FireBreathingChristian
Over the past week – a week in which US President Barack Obama once again put a fine point on America’s long running desire to see Syria’s Bashar Al-Assad deposed – Russia has responded by pointing out an obvious and very inconvenient truth for proponents of US-as-Global-Good-Guy fiction.
That inconvenient truth is that ISIS is, like al Qaeda before it, is a product and tool of the United States. It is a tool of American Empire. It is a well funded and fueled foil by which the ever-expanding power of the American State at home and never ending wars of the American State abroad are justified and exalted to such a level that to even question them is to be deemed unpatriotic and therefore fundamentally untrustworthy.
Yet even as the official State/Big Brother Media narrative drones on, the curtain covering the little men trying to pull our strings and run our lives is getting thinner and thinner. The veneer of “good guy” status used to justify pretty much any behavior by American forces and allies is nearly gone…though that doesn’t prevent many from still trying to imagine that it’s there.
The thread running through al-Qaeda/ISIS/ISIL is proving to be an unintentionally useful display of naked deceit and the Statists’ favored Problem>Reaction>Solution paradigm in action. (See: Oops! We “accidentally armed ISIS”…again…, Oops, we “accidentally” gave ISIS a boatload of Toyotas, and ISIS: Priceless Tool of American Statism.)
As ZeroHedge reported this week, the latest in a looooooong line of “accidental” US support for ISIS/al-Qaeda & Friends comes in the form of…a sweet (and quite useful!) supply of anti-tank missiles:
On September 30, just hours after a three star Russian general strolled into the US embassy in Baghdad and told the staff to inform Washington that Moscow would begin airstrikes in Syria “in one hour”, the Western media was alive with accusations that The Kremlin wasn’t targeting ISIS, but rather other, US and Saudi-backed rebel groups fighting Assad’s depleted SAA. Here’s what The Wall Street Journal said at the time:
“Among seven areas that Syrian state media listed as targets of Russian strikes, only one—an area east of the town of Salamiyah in Hama province—has a known presence of Islamic State fighters. The other areas listed are largely dominated by moderate rebel factions or Islamist groups, such as Ahrar al-Sham and the al Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front.”
Yes, “moderate rebel factions such as the al-Qaeda-affiliated Nusra Front.”
Are you getting that, ‘Merican?
Are you paying any attention here?
Are those who tearfully/angrily sing along with Do You Remember? and relentlessly roar for bombing/invading here, there, and everywhere to “git them Muzlims!” paying any attention at all to reality…a reality in which al-Qaeda is, according to the precious American State, “moderate” and therefore worthy of our support?
Put simply, the US had become so desperate to preserve whatever was left of the strategy to overthrow Assad, that Washington had the mainstream media floating trial balloons to see if the public would accept the characterization of al-Qaeda as “moderate.”
Generally speaking, most Americans didn’t notice, presumably because they were too busy ogling at Russian fighter jets and/or Islamic State’s latest Hollywood special (which at the time was a clip of an SAA fighter being run over by a tank), but for anyone who did pick up on the fact that the mainstream US media had just officially (and posthumously) labeled Osama Bin Laden a “moderate”, the farce was complete.
. . . the fact that the US now counts al-Nusra as a de facto ally came as no surprise. The Saudis and Qatar have backed al-Nusra virtually from the beginning, and the US is all for anything that destabilizes Assad, even if it means funneling guns and money to the very same group that flew passenger jets into skyscrapers on American soil. And let’s not forget that this wouldn’t be the first time Washington has backed al-Qaeda. . .
. . . now, in what can only be described as an embarrassment of truly epic proportions, al-Qaeda has released a video thanking the FSA for supplying al-Nusra with American-made TOWs. Here’s Sputnik:
The Al-Nusra Front, Al-Qaeda’s affiliate in Syria, has released a grateful video, where they openly thank the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which the US has touted as a “moderate opposition group”, for supplying them with US-made anti-tank TOW missiles (“Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided”).
How “unfortunate” that again and again and again we, the great force of goodness known as the United States of America, keep “accidentally” funding, fueling, and encouraging al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the like this way.
All while protecting the open “legal” operation of baby mass murdering and dismembering facilities all across the fruited plain at home, of course. (See: If ISIS did to one American child what Planned Parenthood does to millions, we’d go to war and kill them for it.)
‘Cause, you know, that’s what “freedom” and “liberty” looks like in the “land of the free” and the home of the NSA.
It’s time to wake up, my fellow Americans.
Wake up, repent of the pride and rank emotional manipulation that we’ve allowed to led us to where we are now, and beg God for forgiveness…beg Him to give us a heart and desire for His Law as our own……while there is yet time…
Re: Камедиа
Как тонко Швейцария тролит Россию
В ответ на запрос о выдаче Ходорковского (вора и жулика), они назвали условие ,всего одно условие -
Экстрадиция из Швейцарии в Россию возможна на основе Европейской конвенции о выдаче, пояснил он. «Вместе с тем вопрос об экстрадиции может быть рассмотрен только в том случае, если российские власти предоставят гарантии соблюдения фундаментальных прав.
Re: Камедиа
ну тебе же порчу настроение хоть чуть-чуть.
уже не так мало.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
 
|
