Сначала надо определится с термином:
Equal opportunity is a stipulation that all people should be treated similarly, unhampered by artificial barriers or prejudices or preferences, except when particular distinctions can be explicitly justified.[1] The aim according to this often complex and contested concept[2] is that important jobs should go to those “most qualified” – persons most likely to perform ably in a given task – and not go to persons for arbitrary or irrelevant reasons, such as circumstances of birth, upbringing, friendship ties to whoever is in power,[3] religion, sex,[4] ethnicity,[4] race, caste,[5] or involuntary personal attributes such as disability, age, or sexual orientation.[5][6] Chances for advancement should be open to everybody interested[7] such that they have “an equal chance to compete within the framework of goals and the structure of rules established.”[8] The idea is to remove arbitrariness from the selection process and base it on some “pre-agreed basis of fairness, with the assessment process being related to the type of position,”[3] and emphasizing procedural and legal means.[5][9] Individuals should succeed or fail based on their own efforts and not extraneous circumstances such as having well-connected parents.[10] It is opposed to nepotism[3] and plays a role in whether a social structure is seen as legitimate.[3][5][11]
То есть когда мужчина и женщина борятся за место в "денежном" факультете с ограниченными местами, примут того у кого выше ГПА, а не примут мужика потому что он мужик, или женщину потому что надо набрать квоту, даже если её оценка ниже.
המעז מנצח
كل كلب وله يومه
Лол,Алекс
При всех равных условиях и даже равном ГПА примут мужчину
...и весь твой вывод летит насмарку
/плин.борЮТся, а не брятся.надоели/
а мне последнее время все время попадаются хладнокровные тетки и мужики истерички
Today is a first day of the rest of your life
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|