и еще. кстати. детектив - не мусор. следак.
и еще. кстати. детектив - не мусор. следак.
это одна из функций прокуратуры, при этом вторичнаяOriginally Posted by Труль Экстазе
основная - сопсна судебное преследование обвиняемых.
функции общественного обвинителя в суде обычно выполняет [DA/assistant DA]
в разных штатах эта должность называется по-разному
In the United States the director of any such offices may be known by any of several names depending on the legal jurisdiction (e.g. County Attorney, Prosecuting Attorney (in Michigan, Indiana, and West Virginia), County Prosecutor, State Attorney, State's Attorney, State Prosecutor, Commonwealth's Attorney (in Virginia and Kentucky), District Attorney, District Attorney General (in Tennessee), City Attorney, City Prosecutor, Circuit Attorney (in Missouri) or U.S. Attorney) and may be either appointed or elected.
Originally Posted by Птиц
" GREENSBORO, N.C. (AP) -- Duke lacrosse players file sweeping federal lawsuit against prosecutor, city and police
Three former Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape filed a sweeping federal lawsuit Friday that could return the sensational case to a courtroom, suing disgraced prosecutor Mike Nifong, the city of Durham and the police detectives who handled the investigation.
The lawsuit calls the criminal case against Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and Dave Evans "one of the most chilling episodes of premeditated police, prosecutorial and scientific misconduct in modern American history."
It seeks unspecified damages and numerous reforms to the way the Durham Police Department handles criminal investigations -- including the appointment of a monitor who would have the power to hire, fire and promote department employees, including the chief, for 10 years.
The suit was filed about a month after city officials met with lawyers for the families seeking a $30 million settlement and several legal reforms, two people close to the case have told The Associated Press.
Apparently unable, or unwilling, to reach a deal with the families, the city pledged Friday to defend itself and its employees, but not Nifong -- who held a state office -- or the private DNA testing lab he hired.
City spokeswoman Beverly B. Thompson said the players' complaint "asserts claims against the city and its employees that appear to be based on untested and unproven legal theories."
Should the case go to trial, it would extend a legal debacle that began in March 2006, when a woman hired to perform as a stripper at a lacrosse team party told police she had been raped.
The criminal side of the case largely ended in April, when North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper declared the three players innocent victims of Nifong's "tragic rush to accuse." In dropping the charges, Cooper said the state's investigation found nothing to corroborate the accuser's story, leading his staff to "the conclusion that no attack occurred."
In the months that followed, the state bar stripped Nifong of his law license, concluding he relentlessly pursued a flawed case for political gain. He resigned as Durham County's district attorney and spent a night in jail last month after a judge held him in criminal contempt of court for lying about DNA evidence. He did not immediately return a message Friday seeking comment.
Along with Nifong, the lawsuit names 13 other individual defendants, including former Police Chief Steven Chalmers, police investigators Benjamin Himan and Mark Gottlieb, and Brian Meehan, the director of DNA Security Inc., the private lab that conducted the DNA testing that helped unravel the case. Nifong withheld that evidence from defense attorneys for months.
The lawsuit also names Meehan's lab as a defendant, but it does not name the accuser.
Paul Dickinson Jr., a Charlotte attorney who represents the lab, Meehan and company President Richard Clark, who is also a defendant, said the allegations were false.
The case seeks damages to punish the defendants "for outrageous conduct pursued out of actual malice" that violated the players' civil rights. It also seeks the creation of an independent committee to publicly review complaints of police misconduct, the improvement of police training procedures and an injunction prohibiting Meehan and his laboratory from providing reports or expert testimony in court for 10 years.
"They really do feel like they need to be vindicated and money won't do it," said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond. "They had to spend a year vindicating themselves. I can understand how they would want to have full relief, especially reforming the system if possible."
In June, the players reached an undisclosed financial settlement with Duke University. Richard D. Emery, a New York-based civil rights attorney representing Seligmann, said the players were "committed to making this case about stopping Durham and any other city from falsely accusing and convicting innocent people."
"This is not about money for the boys, though obviously they deserve compensation," Emery said. "This is about sending a message to public officials who only get the message when they have to pay the money."
:kos:
Ps: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html
Last edited by Serge7; 10-11-2007 at 08:21 PM.
Заключениями? А где тут приводились заключения?Originally Posted by Shtirliz
Приводилась статистика. Цифры-проценты. 84% против собственности. А что входит в эти 84%? Если ты потерял свой селфон и хочешь получить новый через страховку - ты должен предоставить полис-репорт. Што его типа украли. Из машины или с сумкой. Вот тебе и преступление против собственности. И это только один из множества примеров.
Дальше. Процент раскрываемости , скажем, преступлений против личности 68%. Много это или мало? Каких именно преступлений? Увеличилась ли раскрываемость по сравнению с предыдущими годами или уменьшилась? Как там с процентом на душу населения? А в других странах? А сколько по тюрьмам сидят? А какая тенденция?
Потомушта столько вопросов, что любой мало-мальски нормальный человек поостережется делать какие-то безаппеляционные заявления.
А уж говорить про 100% раскрываемости и посадки может только.. /тут опять цензурой/
и ваще никто никому ничего не должен кроме взаимной любфи (Ксюша Собчак)
я читала, просто ужастная история. мальчики кстати [settle with duke univercity for undersclosed amount] :rolleyes:Originally Posted by Serge7
это скорее относится к высказыванию Штирлица кас. того, какое отношение ди-эи имеют к раскрытию преступленийOriginally Posted by Serge7
Птиц, всё верно! Но верно и то, скока таких случаев не попадают на страницы газет.. :evillaugh Это я тоже Штирлицу... ;)Originally Posted by Птиц
Он может и заинтересвался, но пока дело физичски и официально не передатут ему, ето не в его котроле.Originally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
Первая часть поста верно, но вторая, где реч о преступлениях против личности, несовсем- в табел представленным Птицем, есть разделения межну убийствами, изнасолаваниями а также тяжкими телесными...Originally Posted by На качелях...
На сайте, кстати есть статистика с сравнени с другими годами, а также сравениями между федералаими и шататом.
Ну а 100% разкрываемости и речи не может быть..масса нарушений просиходит без свидетелей, а иногда свидетели не дают показания или меняуы их в суде. Ето например особенно популярно среди [domestic violence]
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
Штирлиц, ты пытаешься отрицать взаимосвязь между полицейской и прокурорской работой - это глупо, мне кажется.Originally Posted by Shtirliz
ну да бог с ним, нет контроля, так нет. взаимосвязь - есть, того, какие дела идут в производство, а какие - под сукно, надолго и прочно. отсюда и раскрываемость.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|