Legal Stuff & Discussion in English

[Птиц]

Basicly, this.

basically, you don't need to go into this kind of detail to dismiss an argument

an example is bad proof by definition

I would use it to illustrate or highlight a certain aspect

but not as a centerpiece

[Манюня]

Basicly, this.

oh, I addressed it in the other thread

[Shtirliz]

oh, I addressed it in the other thread

Oh, well Ptic doesnt feel satisfied :D So im obliged to rephrase and reargue. Sans grammatical mistakes:D

[Shtirliz]

basically, you don't need to go into this kind of detail to dismiss an argument

an example is bad proof by definition

I would use it to illustrate or highlight a certain aspect

but not as a centerpiece

right, but why is my argumet flawed!!! Geez, will you tell me?

[Манюня]

maybe Ptic can summarize what exactly he is still dissatisfied with

[Shtirliz]

маыбе Птиц цан суммаризе щхат ехацтлы хе ис стилл диссатисфиед щитх

Может если мы вмсете попросим...треееее- 4... :D

[Птиц]

I cant argue with you becasue you dont udnerstad what i write. But if you do understand, after all, why would you point oit my grammatical mistakes? Are they so material or its it because of the lack of arguments?;)

I can get the jist of what you're saying, but if you use language that's too vague I just have to work with what I got - a jumble of vague and dubious statements - as argument

[Манюня]

stop translitting my English! :grum:

[Птиц]

right, but why is my argumet flawed!!! Geez, will you tell me?

I already did, two or three times - you first attack an argument with logic, when I use logic to counter your logic - and you don't have a logical retreat, you use fallacy

clear enough?

[Манюня]

ok, sorry, boys, coffee time