You look at prior similar incidents, I think? And establish the host's knowledge?Originally Posted by Shtirliz
Dude, this is Bar stuff, at this point - I'm struggling to remember![]()
You look at prior similar incidents, I think? And establish the host's knowledge?Originally Posted by Shtirliz
Dude, this is Bar stuff, at this point - I'm struggling to remember![]()
oмайгад
я не знаю есть ли в русском такое понятие как [reckless disregard]...если и есть, то я его так сразу не вспомнюOriginally Posted by Птиц
oмайгад
But you are going directly to the issue of damages. Assume that only 1 person saw it, and it was removed immediately. Has the tort been committed?Originally Posted by Манюня
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
I dont remember anything because cats run around and mice
преступная халатность? :rolleyes:Originally Posted by Манюня
Поху..зм...умишленни:DOriginally Posted by Манюня
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
The tort is committed when the elements are in place.Originally Posted by Shtirliz
All the other elements do not bother you, correct? You are only struggling with the intent part.
I believe the intent is supplied once there is a certain number of similar occurrences and the host still persists in ignoring them. To me, that's recklessness. I.e., intent.
oмайгад
нет ето criminal negligence....ето ниже чем [reckless disregard]Originally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
Мaня, а я вот что подумала....ведь тока на етом форуме, ты ба озолотилася.
это когда криминал...а здесь же речь не о криминале, а о гражданской ответственности...наверно тогда просто халатность?Originally Posted by Птиц
[anyway], обьяснять американские законы русскими терминами - мне не под силу
oмайгад
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|