Thats why such law will never get passed.Originally Posted by Птиц
About your issue, another thing is you could put up an even louder fan and drive her out:evillaugh
Thats why such law will never get passed.Originally Posted by Птиц
About your issue, another thing is you could put up an even louder fan and drive her out:evillaugh
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
great minds think alike :evillaughOriginally Posted by Shtirliz
how am I gonna sleep, then? another alternative would be buying a really powerful floodlight, and have it pointed at her bedroom windows and backyard :evillaugh
My neighbor, at my old house, had one perimeter light that shined into my bedroom.. After a few letters, he still wouldnt turn it a few degrees...i got a bb gun and just shot out the lightOriginally Posted by Птиц
![]()
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
can I consider it legal advise? :rolleyes:Originally Posted by Shtirliz
(the unit is in my field of vision, and a shotgun blast will blow it to smithereens) :cool:
earplugs
и ваще никто никому ничего не должен кроме взаимной любфи (Ксюша Собчак)
долго рассказывал лоерам, что они ничего не понимают
чтобы раскрутить их на [legal advice] :grum:
и ваще никто никому ничего не должен кроме взаимной любфи (Ксюша Собчак)
argumentative to the extremeOriginally Posted by Манюня
it takes brains and talent to become GOOD or even EXCELLENT at something. all it takes to become a "professional" is to scrape through school
the flaw is you make demands on your opponent to show proof. whereas all you do in return is make statements. baseless, usuallyOriginally Posted by Shtirliz
I explained that you made an assumtion that her sudgestion is correct. What basis do you have that the sudgestion is a correct one?Originally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
you don't HAVE to explain anything to me unless I ask for an explanation.Originally Posted by Shtirliz
first you TOOK her example in TOTO and argued it in TOTO. after I pointed there were a couple of logical holes in your assessment, you simply started piling up statements. first you accepted an argument, then you started denying it. as a result, your own argument collapsed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|