Срочно, нужен совет юриста!

[Verbatim]

Although I am still very skeptical about a prison guard's necessity to commit homicide as the only way left for self-defense.

What other ways are there when you've been stabbed in the eye and the "detainee" is aiming for the other? (actual case)

[BOP B 3AKOHE]

Let's not get into a discussion about US media.

Yeah, don't get me started.

First, there are different outlets arguing different points.

They all suck. With the exception of the New York Law Journal, and they border-line suck.

OK-OK, simmer down. No reason to get your panties in a wad!:smoke:

[Verbatim]

I do find it curious, however, that you conceive that the most efficient way for them to look good is by concealing any information.

The most efficient way for anybody to look good would be by concealing negative information, not by underreporting. So if an organization made up its mind to conceal the bad stuff, it would conceal everything. I am saying that your conviction of underreporting has no factual or logical basis.

[BOP B 3AKOHE]

Yeah, but I assume that's where you get your info from.

Well, I get my info from all kind of sources, (some of them I refuse to disclose!:smoke but I do have enough sense to limit my quotes to Amnesty International and ACLU and such. I hope you find them respectful enough.

[Verbatim]

OK-OK, simmer down. No reason to get your panties in a wad!:smoke:

They are not worth my panties, those worthless motormouths. :twisted:

[BOP B 3AKOHE]

Who says they are having difficulty? Having insufficient evidence is by far not the only reason to hold off on the charges.

Well, than we have to ask them what exactly their function is and by what methods they are executing it.

[Verbatim]

Well, I get my info from all kind of sources, (some of them I refuse to disclose!:smoke but I do have enough sense to limit my quotes to Amnesty International and ACLU and such. I hope you find them respectful enough.

I do -- but again, they don't explain the data, which may be misinterpreted, such as the fact that all custodial deaths are investigated. There is no such thing as a non-investigated custodial death. They also do not explain what is involved in the investigation, who conducts it, or the facts of specific cases. All that leaves people to interpret the info any way they want -- and most interpret it according to their a priori political convictions.

[Verbatim]

Well, than we have to ask them what exactly their function is and by what methods they are executing it.

Negotiations between the prosecution and the defendant are not public record. Ever. It's done as much to protect the defendant as to advance the public interest. Between you and me, I am sure an immunity plea will be worked out -- a bigger fish will be caught, and Padilla will walk. Mark my words. (Though I doubt that he wants to walk.)

[BOP B 3AKOHE]

Interesting coincidence - a BBC news alert just popped out "US Attorney General John Ashcroft has resigned from the Bush cabinet, the White House says."

[BOP B 3AKOHE]

What other ways are there when you've been stabbed in the eye and the "detainee" is aiming for the other? (actual case)

I don't know. Conduct proper searches for any sharp objects, so they wouldn't anything to stab with?