В Калифорнии отменён запрет на однополые браки

[Bashmachnica]

Брак – это союз между мужчиной и женщиной с целью продолжения жизни (произведение потомства).

Поэтому, нельзя именовать браком союз между однополыми людьми.

.

А Это вообще BS. If what you said was true, then those who are in legal marriage but don't have kids should be separated as well.
Marriage is not build on reproduction.

[химик]

Это не научное исследование. Ты, [of all people], должен знать разницу. И потом, где там написано именно о статистике детей, выросших в однополых семьях?

Это единственная и научная статистика

[химик]

А Это вообще БС. Иф щхат ёу саид щас труе, тхан тхосе щхо аре ин легал марриаге бут доньт хаве кидс шоулд бе сепаратед ас щелл.
Марриаге ис нот буилд он репродуцтион.

Ошибаешся для всего остального есть доместик парнершип

[seapig]

HETEROSEXUAL couples should manage their lives and marriages, and stop telling other's what they should be doing.

So, .... it is O.K. for homosexual couples to tell everybody else what to do and what is fair, but it is not O.K. for heterosexuals?

[бубенчиков]

А Это вообще BS. If what you said was true, then those who are in legal marriage but don't have kids should be separated as well.
Marriage is not build on reproduction.

Объясните тогда пожалуйста почему не разрешён брак между братьями и сёстрами родителями и детьми. Если это is not build on reproduction.

[Bashmachnica]

Ошибаешся для всего остального есть доместик парнершип

Immigration:

A United States citizen who is married can sponsor his or her non-American spouse for immigration into this country. Those with Civil Unions have no such privilege.


Taxes:

Civil Unions are not recognized by the federal government, so couples would not be able to file joint-tax returns or be eligible for tax breaks or protections the government affords to married couples.


Benefits:

The General Accounting Office in 1997 released a list of 1,049 benefits and protections available to heterosexual married couples. These benefits range from federal benefits, such as survivor benefits through Social Security, sick leave to care for ailing partner, tax breaks, veterans benefits and insurance breaks. They also include things like family discounts, obtaining family insurance through your employer, visiting your spouse in the hospital and making medical decisions if your partner is unable to. Civil Unions protect some of these rights, but not all of them.

[Bashmachnica]

So, .... it is O.K. for homosexual couples to tell everybody else what to do and what is fair, but it is not O.K. for heterosexuals?

As far as I am informed homosexual couples do not care about other people's personal lives, or do they?

[seapig]

А Это вообще BS. If what you said was true, then those who are in legal marriage but don't have kids should be separated as well.
Marriage is not build on reproduction.

You gotta be insane to think that marriage is not first of all and most of all for reproduction and raisng kids. The only one reason it is not in U.S. and state constitutions as a condition of marriage is becasue it was so f... obvious that it did not even have to be mentioned.

[бубенчиков]

Immigration:

A United States citizen who is married can sponsor his or her non-American spouse for immigration into this country. Those with Civil Unions have no such privilege.


Taxes:

Civil Unions are not recognized by the federal government, so couples would not be able to file joint-tax returns or be eligible for tax breaks or protections the government affords to married couples.


Benefits:

The General Accounting Office in 1997 released a list of 1,049 benefits and protections available to heterosexual married couples. These benefits range from federal benefits, such as survivor benefits through Social Security, sick leave to care for ailing partner, tax breaks, veterans benefits and insurance breaks. They also include things like family discounts, obtaining family insurance through your employer, visiting your spouse in the hospital and making medical decisions if your partner is unable to. Civil Unions protect some of these rights, but not all of them.

Вы написали о федеральных законах. Федеральные законы не имеют отношения к законам штатов. Даже в случае одобрения гомосексуальных браков в пределах одного штата, гомосексуалисты в браке не будут иметь федеральных бенефитов.

[Alex5448]

You gotta be insane to think that marriage is not first of all and most of all for reproduction and raisng kids. The only one reason it is not in U.S. and state constitutions as a condition of marriage is becasue it was so f... obvious that it did not even have to be mentioned.

Так запретим браки между 50 летними?