Наташка, бед нещс...те кажетза в трафик скул не пустят. =(Originally Posted by NataliaLA
Наташка, бед нещс...те кажетза в трафик скул не пустят. =(Originally Posted by NataliaLA
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
я тоже так думаю, но поинты я сниму, это не проблема....Originally Posted by Shtirliz
а вот если права заберут, это уже другой разговор...
Харошая машина Бимер....
2007 California Rules of Court
Rule 4.104. Procedures and eligibility criteria for attending traffic violator school
(a) Purpose
The purpose of this rule is to establish uniform statewide procedures and criteria for eligibility to attend traffic violator school.
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2003; previously amended effective July 1, 2001.)
(b) Authority of a court clerk to grant pretrial diversion
(1)Eligible offenses
Except as provided in (2), a court clerk is authorized to grant a request to attend traffic violator school when a defendant with a valid driver's license requests to attend an 8-hour traffic violator school as pretrial diversion under Vehicle Code sections 41501(a) and 42005 for any infraction under divisions 11 and 12 (rules of the road and equipment violations) of the Vehicle Code if the violation is reportable to the Department of Motor Vehicles.
(2)Ineligible offenses
A court clerk is not authorized to grant a request to attend traffic violator school for a misdemeanor or any of the following infractions:
(A)A violation that carries a negligent operator point count of more than one point under Vehicle Code section 12810 or one and one-half points or more under Vehicle Code section 12810.5(b)(2);
(B)A violation that occurs within 18 months after the date of a previous violation and the defendant either attended or elected to attend a traffic violator school for the previous violation (Veh. Code, § 1808.7);
(G)A speeding violation in which the speed alleged is more than 25 miles over a speed limit as stated in Chapter 7 (commencing with section 22348) of Division 11 of the Vehicle Code;
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
Как ти поинти снимеш если тя в трафик скул не пустят?Originally Posted by NataliaLA
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
это я тебе в личке скажу ;)Originally Posted by Shtirliz
Единственни двои аргумент может бит такои: В Цалифорниа деиствует [ Basic Speed Law] Вот её текст :
[Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.]
Тоесть твои аргумент что ехала [reasonably] [prudent] если считать что били поздно, трафика не било, било сухо и ти не [ endager safety of persons or proerty] Но ето [ long shot] , ти всётаки ехала 109 =)
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
мда, посмотрим, надо узнать сколько стоят адвокаты....и сколько будет сам штраф...самое прикольное, что я ехала и не думала, что еду с такой скоростью, полиция была без радара, они зади догнали...Originally Posted by Shtirliz
спросили: What speed were driving?
I said "I don't know probably 85"
Cop start laughing !!! and goes: "You must me kidding me"
He was so nice I did not think he would write 109 in the ticket...
so no radar, they were following me for a short period of time....но слово копа всегда важнее слова водителя...
доказать, что 110 это safe speed....думаю не возможно....если судья хороший может скосить штраф просто....я в судах видела, когда кому-то выписывается штраф на 700 баксов, человек говорит, что виновен, больеш так не буду и судья присуждает ему заплатить 350 там же....
Наташ, ты тикет-то прочитай: Там написано, что по радару скорость 109 была!!!!
а как работает страховка, на сколько они поднимают?...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|