You and your "side" - DECIDE FOR OTHERS WHAT IS GOOD FOR THEM.Originally Posted by Odinokiy_Ostrov
I prefer "personal responsibility" and "free will". Obviously you don't see the difference and don't see that the difference in our opinions is much deeper than this particular case.
Good intentions DO NOT EXCUSE temporary and "justified" suspension of personal freedom and parent-guardian rights.
ONLY THE CURRENT GUARDIAN, not GOVERNMENT has the right to decide what is good for the child. If the guardian feels that it is BETTER FOR A CHILD to drive drunk - she/he MAY HAVE A REASON for it (Maybe aliens are attacking - whatever - it is immaterial). And even if there is no reason, and it is a guardian's mistake - the GOVERNMENT HAS NO RIGHT TO INTERFERE until THERE IS A CRIME... AFTER THE CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITED... NOT BEFORE, NEVER - BEFORE!



Reply With Quote
