you didnt use logic..geez..where? where is the flaw in my argument?Originally Posted by Птиц
you didnt use logic..geez..where? where is the flaw in my argument?Originally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
right now - feigning lack of understanding, for exampleOriginally Posted by Shtirliz
Just show it to me in my post. poit it out..i honestly dont know what you are talking aboutOriginally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
here's another, - using casuistry, stalling, trying to make your opponent go over and over a single statement or even a single word instead of arguing a pointOriginally Posted by Shtirliz
well, not necessarilyOriginally Posted by Птиц
your point may have been unclear to him
it doesn't mean he's stalling, you might have not stated your point clearly
oмайгад
Ok, we are going in circles...u cant point it out, can you?:DOriginally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
what I CAN point out is you probably specially trained in busting an argument with every trick in the bookOriginally Posted by Shtirliz
not winning it with logic
K, thanx for your time. I'm done.:34:Originally Posted by Птиц
**Warning: возможна некорPектная подача личного мнения **
well, if your purpose is to insist that your opponent's case is not being stated clearly enough (to you), you can win by simply making the same statements over and over againOriginally Posted by Манюня
if that is professional skill - I will give it to lawyers
my pleasure. you have proved my thesis for me by simply choosing not to argue :34:Originally Posted by Shtirliz
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|