Вот, говорят, наиболее reliable источники
http://www.iaea.org/
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/
Как отличается реактор Фукушима от реактора в Чернобыле.
The situation in Japan is different from Chernobyl, which had a completely different nuclear power plant design. Chernobyl had an inherently unstable graphite-moderated reactor, not an inherently stable water-cooled reactor. In addition, all western (modern) reactors must have a containment building; Chernobyl did not have one. Therefore, even if the reactor core in Japan were to melt, the primary containment, a steel liner surrounding the reactor core, should limit the release of radiation. However, we do not know if the primary containment was weakened by the earthquake. Nevertheless, the longer the time between shut-down and collapse the better the outlook because the reactor generates less and less heat with time.
World oil prices have dropped $2 on the prospect of lower crude demand from quake-hit Japan. New York's main contract, light sweet crude for delivery in April, has shed $2.0 to $99.16 a barrel. In London morning trade, Brent North Sea crude for April lost $2.02 to $111.82.
Russia says it is ready to divert 6,000 megawatts of electricity to help Japan.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |
|