Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

  1. #1
    Forum Regular In2HiDef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Buckeye State
    Posts
    37,506

    Default NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstrac...DE&legacy=true

    A STERILITY DRUG IN FOOD IS HINTED

    Biologist Stresses Need to Curb Population Growth

    By GLADWIN HILL
    Special to The New York Times

    SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 24 – A possibility that the government might have to put sterility drugs in reservoirs and in food shipped to foreign countries to limit human multiplication was envisioned today by a leading crusader on the population problem.

    The crusader, Dr. Paul Ehrlich of Stanford University, among a number of commentators who called attention to the “population crisis” as the United States Commission for Unesco opened it 13th national conference here today.

    Unesco is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The 100-member commission, appointed by the Secretary of State, included representatives of Government, outside organizations, and the public. Some 500 conservationists and others are attending the two-day meeting at the St. Francis Hotel, devoted this year to environmental problems.

    President Nixon’s chief science adviser, Dr. Lee DuBridge, brought up the population question in his keynote speech last night, calling the reduction of the earth’s population growth rate to zero “the first great challenge of our time.”

    Godfrey a Speaker

    His comments went beyond recent statements of President Nixon, who in a message to Congress stressed the provision of birth control information to underprivileged women.

    But the Federal Government’s willingness to come to grips with population limitation was questioned by another speaker, Arthur Godfrey, radio-television star and a conservation campaigner.

    “Dr. DuBridge rightly said that population control should be the prime task of every government,” he said. “But is there anyone here – anyone – who thinks that this Administration, or the next of the next, will act with the kind of force that’s necessary?”

    Dr. Erlich, who is a biologist said:

    “Our first move must be to convince all those we can that the planet Earth must be viewed as a spaceship of limited carrying capacity.”

    “I think that 150 million people (50 million fewer that there are now) would be an optimum number to live comfortably in the United States.

    ‘Alternative to Armageddon’

    “Some biologists feel that compulsory family regulation will be necessary to retard population growth. It is a dismal prospect – except when viewed as an alternative to Armageddon.”

    He urged establishing a Federal Population Commission “with a large budget for propaganda,” changing tax laws to discourage reproduction and instituting mandatory birth control instruction in public schools.

    He also urged “changing the pattern of Federal support of biomedical research so that the majority of it goes into the broad areas of population regulation, environment sciences, behavior sciences and related areas rather than into short-sighted programs on death control.”

    If such steps are unavailing, he continued, the nation might resort to “the addition of a temporary sterilant to staple food, or to the water supply,” with limited distribution of antidote chemicals, perhaps by lottery.

    Although it might seem that such a program could be started by doctoring foods sent to underdeveloped countries, he said, “the solution does not lie in that direction” because “other people already are suspicious of our motives.”

    Economic Pressure Urged

    Rather, he suggested, the United States should stop economic aid to countries that do not try to limit their populations.

    Dr. Barry Commoner of St. Louis, Washington University ecologist, in an ensuing discussion period differed with Dr. Ehrlich.

    He said that he thought the urge to multiply was rooted in the sense of insecurity. And that the better way to reduce reproduction was by “increasing the well-being of peoples.”

    He also opposed chemical strategems on the ground that “every technological trick like that we’ve tried has caused disaster.”

    Recapitulating the environmental problems stemming from population, Dr. Dubridge said: “Do we need more people on the earth? We all know the answer to that is no. Do we have to have more people? Also no.

    “Can we reverse the urges of a billion years of evolving life? We can. We know techniques for reducing fertility. We are not fully utilizing them.”

    Citing a widespread attitude, he said: ‘We have the right to have as many children as we can afford,’ we say. Do we, today? No.

    “Can we not invent a way to reduce our population growth rate to zero? Every human institution – school, university, church, family, government and international agencies such as Unesco – should set this as its prime task.”

    Source: The New York Times
    Published: November 25, 1969
    "America is too great for small dreams." ~ Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Forum Hero
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Marina del Rey, CA
    Posts
    55,247

    Default Re: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    НЙ таймс. Ха! Ты б ещё что-нибудь из Нашинал инкуайерер перепечатал.
    Я могу заблуждаться, но я не вру.

  3. #3

    Default Re: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    Как сегодня глобал ворминг/клаймет чендж бред так в 60х парились о перенаселении. Откуда и политика разрешения абортов, геев, эвтаназии и т.п. Так что ученые дискредитировали себя не сегодня став климатическими проститутками политиканов а сделали это задолго до, когда пошли на поводу у нацистов, коммуняк и иже с ними.
    Last edited by Miami Vice; 09-15-2017 at 04:42 PM.

  4. #4
    Forum Regular In2HiDef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Buckeye State
    Posts
    37,506

    Default Re: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    Я недавно узнал какой термин в Израиле применяется для леваков, и он меня немало порадовал

    каки-хомо-щыт

    "America is too great for small dreams." ~ Ronald Reagan

  5. #5
    Eulen Spegel Птиц's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Москва
    Posts
    132,075

    Default Re: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    дебильная кокаита ветка

  6. #6
    Forum Regular In2HiDef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Buckeye State
    Posts
    37,506

    Default Re: NY Times: традиция фашистских публикаций с 1969г

    Quote Originally Posted by Miami Vice View Post
    КТак что ученые не дискредитировали себя сегодня став климатическими проститутками политиканов а сделали это задолго до, когда пошли на поводу у нацистов, коммуняк и иже с ними.
    100%. Ребята типа Нила ДеГрасс Тайсона или Билла Ная напоминают мне подпирающую фонарный столб хо', которая ждет какой клиент затащит ее в свою машину.
    "America is too great for small dreams." ~ Ronald Reagan

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russian America Top. Рейтинг ресурсов Русской Америки. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Рейтинг@Mail.ru