Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

  1. #1
    Novice
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    5

    Lightbulb Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Родненькие, подсобите, а то крышка бедной студентке! Помогите качественный пересказ статей (по пол страниц примерно) на английском сделать, а то я в этом языке просто профанка последняя! Требуют ко всему прочему своими словами! ПАНИКА! За варинты с вырваными из контекста фразами поставили замечательный ЗЕРО! В среду последний шанс! Надежда только на вас!
    Ежели кто сможет помочь - по гроб жизни благодарна буду! При необходимости могу тем же помочь, только на французском!

    Тексты статей :

    How to get 10% off everything
    The secret online codes you can use to obtain real discounts at some of Britain's biggest retailers. Hilary Osborne tracks down the passwords and bags a Christmas bargain - but hurry, these codes don't hang around for long. You don't have to wait until the January sales to save money at Hamleys.

    Online shopping is booming this Christmas, but many buyers are failing to pick up across-the-board discounts worth as much as 20% at some of the biggest retailers. These are available simply by typing in codes that can be found on internet forums and specialist sites.
    This weekend Guardian Money reveals some of the most valuable codes - see link for a full list - but beware, these can expire quickly and bargain-hunters need to keep a constant eye out for new discounts.
    Currently you can get £10 off a spend of £50 on anything on John Lewis's website. For example, newspaper ads by John Lewis this week have been promoting Bose in-ear headphones at a price of £69. At the checkout stage of buying, if you press "click here if you have a promotional code" and key in IDH652PCH112, the price will be reduced to £59.
    Another code, TEL225JLD800, knocks £20 off a spend of £100 or more at John Lewis, bringing the price of the new 8GB Ipod Nano down to £109 - £8 less than at Amazon.co.uk. This week shoppers at John Lewis, who were buying particularly generous gifts, could key in Festive30 to save £30 off a £300 spend but sadly that code has now expired.
    These are real discounts, not spurious special offers on end-of-line stock or bulk purchases. And it's not just John Lewis's website where codes can save you cash. Toy shoppers at Hamleys can save 10% with the code UPDATE07 - knocking £3 off the cost of one of this Christmas's must-have toys, the Optimus Prime helmet from Transformers. On luxury items, the discount really comes into its own - the cost of a premium rocking horse can be reduced from £1,500 to £1,350.
    The codes even work on goods that are already running at a special discount. For example, at Boots.com a set of Mark Hill hair straighteners has been reduced from £99.99 to £49.99, but you can save another £5 by typing in FAFS89 before you place your order. The FAFS89 code gives shoppers 10% off everything costing more than £45.
    Trawling the internet throws up many more of these codes - on specialist sites and reader forums. On the forums of Moneysavingexpert, readers are encouraged to post details of the codes they are looking for. Some of the codes produce discounts on specific items, others offer free postage and packing.
    However, sorting the wheat from the chaff can be hard. For every one that works, there are many that do not - either they have expired, or the retailer's website does not recognise them. So we've rounded up the magic numbers - and letters - that will help you save as much as 20% this Christmas.
    While some of the codes are posted by individuals keen to share a bargain with fellow shoppers, others are sent to sites by the retailers themselves. Nick Beeny, who set up Sendmediscounts.co.uk five years ago and lists only codes sent by retailers, says there has been an explosion in the number of offers this year.
    Beeny says the stores are increasingly seeing discount codes as an extension of their marketing activity. So why not just discount everything on their sites? Beeny has an explanation. "They don't want to have a general sale for everyone - they want to keep the mystique of a secret sale," he says. "Through us they know they are reaching dedicated shoppers."
    Mark Pearson, whose site Myvouchercodes.co.uk lists codes sent by stores alongside those sent in by consumers, says it's a clever marketing method. "They send an offer to everyone on their email list and the people will do the work for them. They only need to send it once and it will spread like wildfire."
    Not only does it cost less than traditional marketing, but this way of drumming up business also has other advantages. It means that not all buyers earn a discount, especially casual shoppers who would have been prepared to pay full price anyway. "And if you have the code you feel like you have earned it - you feel special," says Pearson. "And feeling like you are getting one over on a big store may just encourage you to spend more."
    Thorntons is one retailer that uses codes in this way. It gives them to a range of affiliate sites, which receive a payment every time a customer clicks through and makes a purchase. Some of these post the codes on blogs and forums so they may look like they are being shared by consumers, when they have actually come from the shop itself. "Our affiliates have a vested interest in selling our site and it can help if there's an offer on there," says Claire Allen, spokeswoman for Thorntons.
    David Walmsley, head of web selling for John Lewis, is more coy about how the retailer uses the codes. "John Lewis sends emails to its loyal customers throughout the year and occasionally these emails include promotional incentives, such as £10 off £100 spent online," he says.
    "We don't directly provide promotional codes to third-party 'discount' sites; however, sometimes the promotional code for a given email can end up with them."
    Walmsley says the sites are on the retailer's marketing affiliate programme, so they are paid for the customers they pass on to the John Lewis site. He says it prefers affiliates "that provide some kind of unique value to customers, rather than just recycling promotional offers", but that it has "no problem" with the codes being posted.
    Although John Lewis seems willing to honour codes that are passed around, Beeny warns there may be some retailers who are not so keen. In October, Littlewoods surprised shoppers by withdrawing a £25 discount after their purchases had been made. It had discovered that an offer designed for a small number of customers had been picked up online and used by several thousand people.
    The retailer eventually backed down from its plans to reclaim the money from customers, but said Liverpool Trading Standards had supported its line of action. There is a chance other retailers will take a similarly hard line on offers that were designed with only a specific group of shoppers in mind.
    Pearson says his site only lists codes that are open to all, while on Moneysavingexpert users are asked not to post offers that are open only to certain sets of people. Occasionally some slip through the net, but it seems most retailers are now only restricting the amount of time the offer lasts, rather than who it is open to. Which means you may have to act fast to make the most of those discounts.

  2. #2
    Novice
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Вторая.

    Many ways to skin a cat

    Such a lot of data, so little information
    IMAGINE you are an advertiser, you want to place your banners on the most popular website, and you want to know how much to pay. Globally, the leading site is Google, which has the most “page views”. Or is it Microsoft, whose various sites have, in the jargon, the most “time spent”? Or should you go by unique users, duration, hits, click-through, impressions, queries, sessions, streams, or engagement? Whether or not there is truth in advertising, there is certainly none for online advertisers, at least none that is immediately obvious and simple. Bob Ivins, who is in charge of all non-American business for comScore, a big web-measurement firm, says that the web produces data as “a fire-hose shoots water”, and that working out what those data mean is rather like “putting a straw into the fire hose to take a sip”. Get the angle even slightly wrong, and you are blown away.

    Take, for instance, the case of page views, the most widely used measure for much of the past decade. It is the number of times web surfers call up web pages on a given site. Page views became popular in the late 1990s, because they were far superior to the existing measure of “hits”, also known as “file requests”. Hits are confusing because every graphic on a page, as well as the page itself, counts as a hit. If a site owner puts more graphics on his pages, he gets more hits, even if visitors, clicks and everything else stay the same. “We produced hits numbers because we could, not because it was useful,” says one old-timer in the industry.
    By comparison, page views do actually mean something, and are easy to comprehend by analogy to the offline world to boot—many advertisers are still used to counting pagination in magazines. So everybody started paying attention to page views. But then something odd happened. Page views at certain kinds of websites, especially the more sophisticated sort, began to decline, even though the site appeared otherwise healthy and popular.
    The explanation has to do with “Web 2.0”, and more specifically with a constituent technology called “asynchronous JavaScript and XML”, or AJAX. This is a method that lets web pages update parts of themselves—a share-price ticker or an e-mail inbox, say—without having to reload and redraw the rest of the page, resulting in web pages that behave less like documents and more like pieces of software. But this means that a user of an AJAX page, such as Yahoo! Mail or Yahoo! Finance, can spend the entire day working on the same page, and this activity counts as only a single page view.
    Perhaps advertisers should therefore ditch page views in favour of “user sessions”, since that promises to count actual people, and show how many of them use a site. Except that it doesn't, because this measure counts browsers rather than humans. So 2m sessions could mean, theoretically, that 2m people visited a site once, that 1m people visited twice, or that one astonishing individual visited 2m times. People tend to check their favourite pages in the office, at home, and even from their mobile phones, which leads to an overestimate of the number of users. Conversely, sometimes several people watch YouTube clips when gathered around the same screen, which leads to an underestimate of the number of users. Nobody looking at user sessions would ever know.
    As websites, and especially those using AJAX, become more interactive, advertisers are therefore interested in other measures. “Duration” and “time spent”, for instance, suggest how long one or more people were interacting with a page, which in turn hints at how “engaged”, or alert, they were. Using these criteria, social-networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace (part of Fox Interactive Media in the chart) suddenly look attractive.
    In the old days of traditional media, measures may have been simpler, but they were also dumber, says Randall Rothenberg, the boss of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, a trade association. In broadcast television or radio, firms such as Nielsen or Arbitron traditionally give gadgets to samples of volunteers that measure what their televisions or radios are tuned to; or they ask people to fill out diaries describing their reading, listening and viewing habits. Both methods produce notoriously unreliable estimates.
    The web is an open book compared with those old media. Search advertisements, the text links on the results pages of search engines, charge advertisers only when a user actually clicks, thus expressing an interest. “Pre-roll” advertisements that run at the start of a web video report back exactly how many times they were viewed. But when it comes to banner advertising, says Mr Rothenberg, advertisers just have to consider all these new measures as they would a pointillist painting by George Seurat: looking at one dot is no fun; taking them all in can be rewarding.

  3. #3
    Forum Hero
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    9,548

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Быстро отвечайте, сколько слов. Пол-страницы - не очень понятно.

    Каким хоть размером, 12? Ответьте как можно скорее. завтра я уезжаю и могу сделать только сегодня ночью.

  4. #4
    Novice
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Quote Originally Posted by marussya
    Быстро отвечайте, сколько слов. Пол-страницы - не очень понятно.

    Каким хоть размером, 12? Ответьте как можно скорее. завтра я уезжаю и могу сделать только сегодня ночью.
    да да! Надеюсь не опаздала! А даже если о опаздала, то всё равно огромное спасибо за отзывчивость?

    ПыСы : говорят первая статья это вообще реклама! Правда?
    Last edited by zavtra; 12-18-2007 at 02:29 AM.

  5. #5
    Кретинофоб Akela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    86,463

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Да.. Редкой хитрости спаммер...
    не плачте - будет И на вашей улице едик.... (c) Edik

  6. #6
    Novice
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Quote Originally Posted by Akela
    Да.. Редкой хитрости спаммер...
    Ничего не спамер... Просто моих знаний английского явно не хватило что бы отличить рекламу от статьи, особенно если учесть тот факт, что текст найден на economistE - солидное издание ведь!
    Кстати, не знаю как исправить первый пост - я теперь кажется НАСТОЯЩУЮ статью нашла! Как заменить?

  7. #7
    Кретинофоб Akela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    86,463

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Quote Originally Posted by zavtra
    Ничего не спамер... Просто моих знаний английского явно не хватило что бы отличить рекламу от статьи, особенно если учесть тот факт, что текст найден на ецономистЕ - солидное издание ведь!
    Кстати, не знаю как исправить первый пост - я теперь кажется НАСТОЯЩУЮ статью нашла! Как заменить?
    Никак. Ты заменить не можешь.
    Зато можешь написать новый пост с новой статьей.
    не плачте - будет И на вашей улице едик.... (c) Edik

  8. #8
    Novice
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Спасибо за совет!
    И прошу прощение за спам! :rolleyes: Я правда не нарошно!

  9. #9
    Настоящий Индеец
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Шайтаун
    Posts
    9,037

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    А где про мафию статья?

    А вот я как быстро перевёл.
    ПРЕДСТАВЛЯЕТ вы будет advertiser, вы хотите установить ваши знамена на самом популярном web site, и вас хотят знать для того чтобы оплатить. Гловально, leading место будет Google, которое имеет большинств «страницу осматривает». Или будет это Microsoft, места которого различные, в жаргоне, большинств «имеют потраченным временем»? Или должны вы пойти уникально потребителями, продолжительностью, ударами, click-через, впечатлениями, queries, встречами, потоками, или захватом? Будет ли или правда в рекламировать, некоторо никакие для online рекламодателей, по крайней мере никакое которое немедленно очевидно и просто. Bob Ivins, который in charge of полностью non-Американское дело для comScore, большая фирма стержн-измерения, говорит что стержень производит данные как «всходы пожар-шланга мочат», и что разрабатывающ середина тех данных довольно как «класть сторновку в шланг пожара для того чтобы принять sip». Получите неправду угла даже небольш, и вы дунуты отсутствующе. Примите, for instance, случай взгляды страницы, само широко используемое измерение для много из прошлой декады. Это будет числом времен искателя информации в Интенете, котор call up страницы стержня на, котор дали месте. Взгляды страницы стали популярными in the late 1990s, потому что они были далеко главны к existing измерению «ударов», также известный как «архив спрашивает». Удары confusing потому что каждый график на странице, также, как страница сама, подсчитывает как удар. Если предприниматель места одевает в больше графиков его страницы, то он получает больше ударов, even if визитеры, clicks и все еще остаются этими же. «Мы произвели номера ударов потому что мы смогли, не потому что было полезно,» говорим один стар-отметчик времени в индустрии. сравнением, взгляды страницы фактическ намереваются что-то, и легки для того чтобы постигнуть аналогией к offline миру к ботинк-много рекламодателей все еще использованы к подсчитывать пагинации в кассетах. Настолько каждое начало обратить внимание взгляды страницы. Но после этого что-то слученное сверхсчетное. Вызовите взгляды на некоторых видах websites, специально более изощренного вида, начал склонять, даже если место показалось в противном случае здоровым и популярным. Объяснение должно сделать с «стержнем 2.0», и более специфически при составная вызванная технология «асинхронным JavaScript и XML», или AJAX. Это будет метод препятствует страницам стержня уточнить части себя- тиккер дол-цены или inbox и-мэйла, говорить-без перезарядить и redraw остальнои страницы, resulting in страницы стержня которые поступают более менее как документы и more like части средства программирования. Но это намеревается что потребитель страницы AJAX, such as Yahoo! Почта или Yahoo! Финансы, могут потратить весь день работая на такой же странице, и отсчеты этой RABOTы как только одиночный взгляд страницы. Возможно рекламодателя должны поэтому ditch взгляды страницы in favour of «встречи потребителя», с тех пор те обещает подсчитать фактические людей, и показывает из их польза место. Except that оно не делает, потому что это измерение подсчитывает браузеры rather than людей. Встречи настолько 2m смогли намереваться, теоретически, что люди 2m посещали место раз, что люди 1m навещаемые дважды, или что времена одного удивительнейшие индивидуальные посещенные 2m. Люди клонат проверить их страницы фаворита в офисе, дома, и выравниваются от их мобильных телефонов, который водит к overestimate числа потребителей. Наоборот, иногда несколько людей наблюдают зажимы YouTube после того как они собираны вокруг такого же экрана, который водит к недооценивать числа потребителей. Никто смотря встречи потребителя всегда знало бы. По мере того как websites, и специально те используя ое AJAX, более взаимодействующи, рекламодателя поэтому заинтересованы в других измерениях. «Продолжительность» и «время потратили», for instance, предложите сколько времени one or more люди взаимодействовал с страницой, которая в свою очередь намекает на как «включил», или сигнал тревога, они было. Использующ эти критерии, места социальн-networking such as Facebook и MySpace (часть средств лисицы взаимодействующих в диаграмме) неожиданно смотрят привлекательными. В старых днях традиционных средств, измерения могут быть простоее, но они были также более тупы, говорят Randall Rothenberg, босс взаимодействующей рекламируя конторы, торговую ассоциацию. В телевидении или радиоем передачи, фирмах such as tradi Nielsen или Arbitron

  10. #10
    Forum Hero Буржуй's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    111,303

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Спам чистой воды
    Barack Obama on his girls: "I have men with guns surrounding them at all times, which I'm perfectly happy with..." (c) Why can he protect his family with guns and I can't?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russian America Top. Рейтинг ресурсов Русской Америки. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Рейтинг@Mail.ru