Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

  1. #11
    Настоящий Индеец
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Шайтаун
    Posts
    9,037

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Quote Originally Posted by zavtra
    Спасибо за совет!
    И прошу прощение за спам! :rolleyes: Я правда не нарошно!
    Я по изложениям в школе всегда тройки получал, вы тоже нас извините.

  2. #12
    Forum Hero
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    9,548

    Default Re: Надежда только на вас! HELP!

    Such a lot of data, so little information
    IMAGINE you are an advertiser, you want to place your banners on the
    most popular website, and you want to know how much to pay. Should you
    go by unique users, duration, hits, click-through, impressions,
    queries,
    sessions, streams, page views or engagement?

    Bob Ivins, who is in charge of all non-American business for comScore,
    a
    big web-measurement firm, says that the web produces data as ⌠a
    fire-hose shoots water■, and that working out what those data mean is

    rather like ⌠putting a straw into the fire hose to take a sip■.

    Page views where the most widely used measure for much of the past
    decade. It is the number of times a web browser calls up a web page on
    a
    given site. Page views became popular in the late 1990s, because they
    were far superior to the existing measure of ⌠hits■, also known as
    ⌠file
    requests■. "Hits" account every graphic on a page, as well as the
    page
    itself, counts as a hit. So that if a site owner put more graphics on
    his pages, he would get more hits, even if everything else stayed the
    same. ⌠We produced hits numbers because we could, not because it was
    useful,■ says one old-timer in the industry.

    Page views means something else entirely and are easy to comprehend by
    analogy to the offline world to boot≈many advertisers are still used
    to
    counting pagination in magazines. Since then, everybody cares about
    page
    views. Strangely, page views at certain kinds of websites, especially
    the more sophisticated sort, began to decline, even though the site
    appeared otherwise healthy and popular.

    The explanation has to do with ⌠Web 2.0■, and more specifically
    with a
    constituent technology called ⌠asynchronous JavaScript and XML■, or

    AJAX. This is a method that lets web pages update parts of
    themselves≈a
    share-price ticker or an e-mail inbox, say≈without having to reload
    and
    redraw the rest of the page, resulting in web pages that behave less
    like documents and more like pieces of software.

    While a page view calls up a complete page to the browser, AJAX, or
    "asynchronous JavaScript and XML" allows information to be sent piece
    meal. The maps.google.com page is a great example of this Web 2.0
    technology. Thus, a trip can be planned, or hours spent virtually
    traveling the world would could as a single page view.

    So, a better metric could be ⌠user sessions■, since that promises
    to
    count actual people, and show how many of them use a site. Its very
    hard
    to know how many actual people are visiting a site by user session. Is
    it one over active individual going to the site 100 times a day or one
    hundred users going once?

    This could easily lead to overestimate of the number of users.
    Inversely, several could watch a video at the same time, which would
    leads to an underestimate of the number of users. User session does not

    inform about these users.

    Thus, AJAX enabled websites now favor ⌠Duration■ and ⌠time
    spent■, which
    suggests how long one or more people were interacting with a page,
    which
    gives clues at how ⌠engaged■, they were by the media on the page.
    By
    using these criteria, social-networking sites like, Facebook and
    Stumbleupon suddenly look attractive.

    The web's roots in information technology show clearly in these
    consideration. The many ways to examine online presence puts the old
    media to shame. Compare all these measures to the Neilson survey and
    the
    level of detail available to online advertisers. As the technology
    advances, more sophisticated measures and methods of understanding
    those
    who consume the data.



    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    As the holiday season is coming closer to its fever pitch, more
    retailers are turning to online coupons to attract clients to their
    online stores.

    Looking through the internet, one can find many codes - on specialist
    sites and reader forums, that can then be given to retailers for
    discounts. For example, on the forums of Moneysavingexpert, members
    post
    details of the codes they are looking for. These codes produce
    discounts
    on specific items, others offer free postage and packing.

    In some cases, the codes are given by individuals wishing to share a
    bargain with fellow shoppers, while others are sent to these sites and
    forums by the retailers themselves. Sendmediscounts.co.uk which was
    founded by Nick Beeny five years ago and specializes only in codes sent

    by retailers, says there has been an explosion in the number of offers
    this year.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Russian America Top. Рейтинг ресурсов Русской Америки. Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Рейтинг@Mail.ru