на NPR часто говорят об изменении климата, он сослался на одну передачу.. если в одной передаче не рассказали об одном каком-то моменте - это не значит, что их редакция что-то скрывает от интухайдера.. расскажут в другой раз
нет, не думаю, что NPR что-то скрывает от него
теперь я ответил тебе ?
Mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama! (детская песенка)
Ты мне ответил, но я с тобой поспорю.
Думаешь в другой статье о глобальном климате они расскажут о росте антарктических льдов не упомянув о таяние арктических? Думаешь они не предвзяты а просто идиоты?
Я сделал поиск на их сайте по антарктическим льдам и просмотрев пару дюжен статей не нашел упоминаний о растущих антарктических льдах. Зато нашел рассказы об антарктических айсбергах как свидетельств о глобальном потеплении, опять же без упоминаний об общей тенденции в антарктике.
По-твоему это честное освещение темы?
Mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack Hussein Obama! (детская песенка)
рыбе не обязательно питаться комарами... ей достаточно просто жить в воде, куда стекает ДДТ
DDT is also highly toxic to aquatic life, including crayfish, daphnids, sea shrimp and many species of fish.
DDT чуть напрочь не извел орла, того самого, что красуется на эмблеме страны
"Пипл (в лице Галлюциногена) хавает"(ц)
“A Wikipedia trustee and a Wikipedian In Residence have been editing the online encyclopedia on behalf of PR clients,” says this article on cnet.com. “Add the discovery of an SEO business run on the side, and this tempest is out of its teapot.”
This latest scandal brings to mind the Wikipedia administrator accused of re-writing more than 5,000 Wikipedia entries in order to spread the global warming message.
“History of climate gets ‘erased’ online,” shouted the headline on wnd.com.
“More than 5,000 entries rewritten to hype global-warming agenda”
Here are excerpts from that article:
“A new report reveals a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator rewrote climate history, editing more than 5,000 unique articles in the online encyclopedia to cover traces of a medieval warming period – something Climategate scientists saw as a major roadblock in the effort to spread the global warming message.
Recently hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit expose a plot to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period, a 400-year era that began around A.D. 1000, the Financial Post’s Lawrence Solomon reports.
The warming period is said to have improved agriculture and increased life spans, but scientists at the center of the Climategate e-mail scandal believed the era undermined their goal of spreading concern about global warming as it pertains to today’s climate.
Instead, the group created a website called RealClimate.org.
The RealClimate.org team consisted of Schmidt, Mike Mann, Eric Steig, William Connolley, Stefan Rahmstorf, Ray Bradley, Amy Clement, Rasmus Benestad and Caspar Ammann.
Solomon revealed that Connolley, one man in the nine-member team who is a U.K. scientist, a software engineer and Green Party activist, took control of Wikipedia’s entries to see that any trace of the true climate history would be erased.
Beginning in February 2003, Connolley rewrote Wikipedia entries on global warming, the greenhouse effect, the instrumental temperature record, the urban heat island, on climate models and on global cooling, according to the report. In February, he began editing the Little Ice Age. By August, he began to rewrite history without the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned to the hockey-stick chart.
Through his role as a Wikipedia administrator, Connolley is said to have created or rewritten 5,428 unique Wikipedia entries.
“When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it – more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand,” Solomon wrote. “When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred – over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions.”
Through his control of the Wikipedia pages, Connolley is said to have “turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.”Для кого хуже, для больных? для личинок комара?По поводу твоего способа лечения малярии дустом - подумай, может быть это тот случай когда лечение хуже болезни ?
А как же твой прицип не переводить обсуждение тем на обсуждение собеседника, тем более в хамском формате? Способен ли лицемер и демагог понять, что он лицемер и демагог? Бугагахарактеризуют именно тебя как ментально нестабильного чилавека, потомушто все это в твоей голове...ты бы описывал мерзкие гадости если тебе показали всего лишь картинку с квадратиком...Способен ли психбольной понять что он болен.. или дурак - осознать что он неумен ?
Как лицемерно с твоей стороны заботиться об орле и плевать на людей. Помни, что жертвование людьми в угоду идеологии-основа фашизма.
По поводу знаменитой книги о ДДТ и птичках, пара цитат:
Fifty years after the publication of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, the book's legacy is mixed. It helped raise awareness about the costs of mass spraying operations, but it also provided justification for campaigns against the use of DDT in malaria control programs, which contributed to the deaths of millions in Africa and Asia. Earlier in her writing career, she was a well respected nature writer, but in Silent Spring, she shifted to advocating positions linked to a darker tradition in American environmental thinking: neo-Malthusian population control and anti-technology efforts. Her background as a nature writer gave credence to these views and helped build those darker themes into mainstream environmentalism today. Many, such as the late Julian Simon, viewed this as a tragic turn.Те же орлиные яйца, вид сбоку- перевирание науки, ненависть к человечеству, либеральные ручки тянутся к власти.II. ADVOCACY AGAINST DDT. DDT was demagogued out of use. 10.Rachel Carson sounded the initial alarm against DDT, but represented the science of DDT erroneously in her 1962 book Silent Spring. Carson wrote “Dr. DeWitt’s now classic experiments [on quail and pheasants] have now established the fact that exposure to DDT, even when doing no observable harm to the birds, may seriously affect reproduction. Quail into whose diet DDT was introduced throughout the breeding season survived and even produced normal numbers of fertile eggs. But few of the eggs hatched.” DeWitt’s 1956 article (in Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry) actually yielded a very different conclusion. Quail were fed 200 parts per million of DDT in all of their food throughout the breeding season. DeWitt reports that 80% of their eggs hatched, compared with the “control”" birds which hatched 83.9% of their eggs. Carson also omitted mention of DeWitt’s report that “control” pheasants hatched only 57 percent of their eggs, while those that were fed high levels of DDT in all of their food for an entire year hatched more than 80% of their eggs.
11. Population control advocates blamed DDT for increasing third world population. In the 1960s, World Health Organization authorities believed there was no alternative to the overpopulation problem but to assure than up to 40 percent of the children in poor nations would die of malaria. As an official of the Agency for International Development stated, “Rather dead than alive and riotously reproducing.” [Desowitz, RS. 1992. Malaria Capers, W.W. Norton & Company]
12. The environmental movement used DDT as a means to increase their power. Charles Wurster, chief scientist for the Environmental Defense Fund, commented, “If the environmentalists win on DDT, they will achieve a level of authority they have never had before.. In a sense, much more is at stake than DDT.”[Seattle Times, October 5, 1969]
"America is too great for small dreams." ~ Ronald Reagan
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |